Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Epigenetics & Chromatin and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research

Core promoter acetylation is not required for high transcription from the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase promoter in maize

Ina Horst1, Sascha Offermann2, Bjoern Dreesen3, Markus Niessen1 and Christoph Peterhansel1*

Author Affiliations

1 Leibniz University Hannover, Institute of Botany, 30419 Hannover, Germany

2 Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA

3 RWTH Aachen, Biology I, 52056 Aachen, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

Epigenetics & Chromatin 2009, 2:17  doi:10.1186/1756-8935-2-17

Published: 2 December 2009

Abstract

Background

Acetylation of promoter nucleosomes is tightly correlated and mechanistically linked to gene activity. However, transcription is not necessary for promoter acetylation. It seems, therefore, that external and endogenous stimuli control histone acetylation and by this contribute to gene regulation. Photosynthetic genes in plants are excellent models with which to study the connection between stimuli and chromatin modifications because these genes are strongly expressed and regulated by multiple stimuli that are easily manipulated. We have previously shown that acetylation of specific histone lysine residues on the photosynthetic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (Pepc) promoter in maize is controlled by light and is independent of other stimuli or gene activity. Acetylation of upstream promoter regions responds to a set of other stimuli which include the nutrient availability of the plant. Here, we have extended these studies by analysing histone acetylation during the diurnal and circadian rhythm of the plant.

Results

We show that histone acetylation of individual lysine residues is removed from the core promoter before the end of the illumination period which is an indication that light is not the only factor influencing core promoter acetylation. Deacetylation is accompanied by a decrease in gene activity. Pharmacological inhibition of histone deacetylation is not sufficient to prevent transcriptional repression, indicating that deacetylation is not controlling diurnal gene regulation. Variation of the Pepc promoter activity during the day is controlled by the circadian oscillator as it is maintained under constant illumination for at least 3 days. During this period, light-induced changes in histone acetylation are completely removed from the core promoter, although the light stimulus is continuously applied. However, acetylation of most sites on upstream promoter elements follows the circadian rhythm.

Conclusion

Our results suggest a central role of upstream promoter acetylation in the quantitative regulation of gene expression in this model gene. Induced core promoter acetylation is dispensable for the highest gene expression in the diurnal and circadian rhythm.