Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Epigenetics & Chromatin and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Epigenetics and Chromatin: Interactions and processes

Open Access Poster presentation

Polymer models of yeast S. cerevisiae genome organization

Geoff Fudenberg1*, Jon-Matthew Belton2, Anton Goloborodko3, Maxim Imakaev3, Job Dekker2 and Leonid Mirny34

  • * Corresponding author: Geoff Fudenberg

Author Affiliations

1 Biophysics, Harvard University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

2 Systems Biology, UMASS Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA

3 Physics, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA

4 Division of Health Science and Technology, Harvard-MIT, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Epigenetics & Chromatin 2013, 6(Suppl 1):P128  doi:10.1186/1756-8935-6-S1-P128

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.epigeneticsandchromatin.com/content/6/S1/P128


Published:8 April 2013

© 2013 Fudenberg et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Introduction

Three-dimensional (3D) chromosomal organization impacts critical cellular processes including transcription, replication, and genomic stability. Despite the ubiquity of these challenges, recent 3C-based experiments [1] suggest that major features of interphase chromosomal organization vary across eukaryotes. In human cells, Hi-C revealed that chromosomal regions of similar functional state (eg. high gene expression) were enriched for contact probability in 3D [2]. Conversely, 3D contact probability was depleted between regions with different functional states. Moreover, the probability of a contact between two genomic loci was found to be inversely proportional to intervening genomic distance, s1 and consistent with an unknotted non-equilibrium fractal globular polymer state. Here we analyze new, high-coverage, Hi-C data and developed stochastic simulations of polymer dynamics to study the spatial organization of yeast chromosomes.

Results

Unlike in human chromosomes, we find no evidence of a domain-type organization in yeast. Furthermore, we find that contact probability decays more like s -3/2 with increasing genomic distance in cerevisiae; this indicates that yeast chromosomes do not exhibit a fractal globule organization. Instead, we find that a Rabl-like organization of chromosomes and constraints from the nucleolus appear to be the most prominent features of chromatin organization [3,4]. In this Rabl organization, centromeres are co-localized near the spindle pole body on one side of the nucleus. Our stochastic polymer simulations allow us to reconstruct conformational ensembles consistent with Hi-C maps. We demonstrate that a Rabl organization leads to cross-like patterns of interactions between centromeric regions, as observed in yeast Hi-C data. Our simulations also allow us to match experimental data on diffusion of individual genomic loci; this allows us to study the temporal evolution of chromosomal conformations.

Conclusions

Our models show that: (1) yeast chromosomes are generally consistent with a mildly confined “equilibrium globular” polymer state, in contrast with observations in human cell lines; (2) tethering in a Rabl conformation induces a ‘polymer brush’ effect which reproduces the majority of observed intra- and inter- chromosomal Hi-C interactions in yeast; (3) rapid progression through the cell cycle allows for spatial, but not necessarily topological, equilibration of yeast chromosomes, limiting their mutual entanglement.

References

  1. Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N: Capturing Chromosome Conformation.

    Science 2002, 295:1306. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, Amit I, Lajoie BR, Sabo PJ, Dorschner MO, Sandstrom R, Bernstein B, Bender MA, Groudine M, Gnirke A, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Mirny LA, Lander ES, Dekker J: Comprehensive Mapping of Long-Range Interactions Reveals Folding Principles of the Human Genome.

    Science 2009, 326:289. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  3. Duan Z, Andronescu M, Schutz K, Mcllwain S, Kim YJ, Lee C, Shendure J, Fields S, Blau CA, Noble WS: A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome.

    Nature 2010, 465(7296):363-367. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  4. Therizols P, Duong T, Dujon B, Zimmer C, Fabre E: Chromosome arm length and nuclear constraints determine the dynamic relationship of yeast subtelomeres.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010, 107(5):2025-2030. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL